Streaming & Charts

DTMF Broke the Record — But Bad Bunny Got There Faster Than Anyone Ever Has

Bad Bunny's "DTMF" just spent 71 weeks (and counting, as of early August 2026) at #1 on Billboard's Hot Latin Songs chart — more than any single song has ever managed in the chart's 40-year history. Zoom out to a full career, though, and the all-time record for total time at #1 still technically belongs to Enrique Iglesias. The catch: it took him 21 years to build it. Bad Bunny may have already matched it in seven.

Three charts: the single-song #1 record led by DTMF at 71 weeks; a career-relative cumulative comparison showing Bad Bunny reaching 194 weeks in 7 years versus Enrique Iglesias's 189 weeks in 21 years; and all 44 of their combined #1 hits ranked by weeks at #1

The dataset

Three layers here, all Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart data (est. 1986):

  1. Single-song record progression (6 songs) — the handful of songs that have each held the record for longest #1 reign at some point since 1986, verified via Billboard's own chart-beat reporting.
  2. Enrique Iglesias's full catalog (27 songs) — every #1 hit of his career, sourced from Wikipedia's "List of Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart achievements and milestones." We summed all 27 songs' individual week counts and got exactly 189 — matching Wikipedia's independently-stated career total for Iglesias, the current all-time cumulative leader. That match is our confidence check on the per-song figures.
  3. Bad Bunny's full catalog (17 songs) — same Wikipedia source. His song count (17) is independently confirmed by Billboard reporting ("his 17th chart-topper, breaking a tie with Luis Miguel"). But summing his 17 songs' weeks gives 194 — a number no news source has explicitly confirmed as his official career total. We're disclosing that clearly: 194 is our own calculation from published per-song data, not a headline-reported figure. Older articles (from earlier in 2026, before DTMF's run stretched past 57+ weeks) say he "hasn't yet surpassed" Iglesias's 189 — which was likely true when written, but may no longer be, given how much DTMF alone has grown since.

Full data and code for this post — including all three CSVs and the analysis script — are in the Track Record GitHub repo.

The method

  1. Compiled the 6-song single-record progression and the two artists' full #1 catalogs (44 songs total), each with release year and weeks at #1.
  2. Cross-checked the Enrique Iglesias list by summing it against his independently-reported 189-week career total — it matched exactly, which gave us confidence in the underlying data source.
  3. To compare two careers that started 23 years apart on a fair basis, we re-indexed both artists' timelines to "years since their first #1 hit" instead of calendar year, then plotted cumulative weeks at #1 against that shared clock.
  4. Also charted all 44 individual songs from both artists on one ranked bar chart.

What it showed

On the single-song record (panel 1): DTMF's 71 weeks has now beaten Despacito's former 56-week record by 15 weeks, and it's still running — up from 66 weeks as of February 2026.

On the career comparison (panel 2), plotted on the same "years since first #1" clock: Bad Bunny hit 194 combined weeks at #1 within 7 years of his first chart-topper (2018's "MIA" and "Te Bote"). Enrique Iglesias took 21 years — from his first #1 in 1995 to 2016 — to accumulate his 189. Bad Bunny's climb is steep and recent (driven heavily by DTMF's 71-week run); Iglesias's is a long, steady accumulation across two and a half decades, one hit-filled era after another.

On the full 44-song breakdown (panel 3): past their two respective long-reigning anchors (DTMF at 71, Bailando at 41), the rest of both catalogs looks fairly similar in shape — a handful of multi-week hits, and a long tail of singles that only spent one week at #1. Ten of Iglesias's 27 hits, and 6 of Bad Bunny's 17, were one-week wonders at the top.

Takeaway: Bad Bunny has very likely built a bigger cumulative #1 total than Enrique Iglesias, faster than anyone in the chart's history — but treat our 194-week figure as a well-sourced estimate, not a confirmed headline number, since we derived it ourselves from per-song data rather than finding one outlet state it directly. If DTMF's reign ends soon, this comparison is worth revisiting with the final number. As always, chart methodology has shifted over the decades (streaming weight, radio panels, etc.), so comparing eras exactly is illustrative, not perfectly apples-to-apples.

← Back to all posts